Another expensive cheap phone
Estimating the iPhone 16E is a challenge. It’s objectively a good phone – good enough for the majority of people. It has a TOP advanced screen (although its watch is 60Hz, while some Android phones near this price point manage 120Hz), a camera system that offers quality, even if it has a lack of special features than the flagship, strong contact and performance.
If you do not care about extra camera features or things taken from the megassaf or dynamic island, such as good toy, it is easy to recommend a savings of Rs 200 compared to the iPhone 16.
The major criticism I have is related to the 16E phone itself is less than Apple’s overall lineup. The iPhone SE retail for $ 430, about 16 HALF price of 16.
Now, it is noteworthy that a huge advantage of the target market for 16e will buy it in subsidies by carrier, so they may not pay more than that. I always recommend buying a direct phone if you can, though, because carrier subsidies deals are usually worse for consumers.
The price of 16E can force more people to go for subsidy. In addition, this is more phone than some people needed. For example, I like a high quality OLED display to watch movies, but I don’t think the username of ordinary iPhone SE didn’t care about it.
That’s why I’m sure the iPhone 16E solves more problems than users for Apple. In numerous ways, it allows Apple to smooth production, software support, and marketing messaging. This increases the average price per unit in the entire iPhone line and will probably encourage people who spend $ 600 to spend $ 430 instead of potentially improving revenue. Everyone was told, this is a brain for Apple.
This is just a mixed bag for the Nun Ferrells user who wants the least viable phone and who did not want to go on Android for another reason. The iPhone 16E is definitely a good phone. I wish there were more options for this user.
Nice
- Dramely better display than iPhone SE
- Long -term software support than most previous entry level iPhones
- Good battery life and incredibly good performance for this price point
- A high quality camera, especially for price
Bad
- Ultra wide camera not
- Not megasaf
- No dynamic island
Ugly
- The iPhone significantly increases the admission cost