In many ways, NASA’s Science Directorate is the guardian of the space agency. In the last 25 years, almost all important achievements have been provided by science programs. Easily Flying on Mars, new horizons through Pluto, James Webpace Telescope images, discovery of thousands of expatilitians, return of samples from Kishorgara and Dumkites, discovery of water plums on Ennaslades by Cassini, permanent robotic presence on Mars, and more. Even the recent lunar landing was provided through the NASA Science Directorate through firefly and intuitive machines.
Of NASA’s $ 25 billion budget, however, only 30 % of science has been allocated. For fiscal year 2024It was worth $ 7.4 billion. These costs were divided for about $ 2.7 billion for planets, $ 2.2 billion for Earth Science, $ 1.5 billion for astronomical physics, and $ 800 million for helicopter.
NASA Science Funding Since 1980.
Credit: Casey Director/Planet Society
NASA Science Funding Since 1980.
Credit: Casey Director/Planet Society
The proposed deductions are being driven by the recently certified director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, Russell vote, which sets budget and policy priorities for the presidential administration. By somehow, the budget decisions should not come like a surprise, as they are in accordance with what is suggested in one “Shadow” budget for fiscal year 2023 As part of your center for US renewal.
“The budget also proposes a 50 percent reduction in NASA science programs and spending, which has reduced their misguided carbon reduction system costs and global climate change programs,” the Wweet’s organization wrote in its December 2022 report.
Zero land science?
Despite the desire to vote, however, NASA has clearly been accused of studying our planet.
The Congress Act that created NASA In 1958, the Space Agency was demanded to increase human knowledge about the Earth’s environment and space, and the agency’s Earth observation satellites have greatly increased our understanding of the weather, changing climate and the use of land.
Even if NASA’s Earth Science Budget is taken to zero, reducing the overall budget of science in half will still reduce dramatic financing in planets as well as other research sectors. Scientists told the ARS that NASA would be forced to make difficult decisions, including possibly closing extended missions on Mars and curiosity investigations, and possibly even the Hubble Space Telescope. It may be possible to save missions in the post -development stages, such as Saturn’s moon Titan’s dragon fly investigation, and the NEO surveyor mission to look for a hazardous discipline. But it would be impossible to launch meaningful new missions for the detection of solar systems, possibly presenting planets in a decade.