Trump could possibly come for these funds, but the provisions of the chips of the Chips Act are “being mobilized only for ‘non -performance’,” Ezil noted, that is, the company is not doing what he promised. “And” although in theory, “Trump” can use corrupt or baseless measures to go after the Congress allocated and mandatory funds, “Ezil suggested that” it is unlikely. “Some sources of NYT suggested that many” people’s confidence in the industry were not confident. “
Instead of providing subsidy, though, Trump wants to punish the chipmosts outside the United States, and threaten that the semiconductor imports will probably be threatened to potentially impose prices on April 2. But the project can be put in a short light, as the NYT has stated that “lawyers and industry executives have said that the chips themselves are not effective.” Instead, chips are usually kept in electronic devices and equipment in factories in Asia before consumer tech imports to the United States.
Ezil told ARS that he suspects that Republicans can force Trump to pass some new version of the bill like chips 2.0. Ezil suggests that it seems “more likely” that the Trump administration “operates slowly or changes certain terms of the deal.
Although companies do not necessarily profit chips subsidies, withdraw funds or delay competitive positions, Anil warns that chip mechanors like Intel may be trying to make a riot, which some observers believe the chips were financed by the chips. In his analysis of 2024, Ezil writes that Intel’s financial struggle should not be allowed to refuse to financing chips, as Senator Rick Scott (R-Fla) once emphasized, but in the United States, a viable American chipmaker needs to raise funds to raise funds.
“When Intel is fighting for survival, the last thing that the Trump administration should do is to recover financing, which is very important for Intel’s recovery and expansion strategy, or withdraw from financing, which is the main semiconductor companies, from Micron and Global and Global Foundation.”