Since businesses have started to convert humans with AI “agents”, the coding assistant cursor must have peeked us on the attitude that boats can work.
The cursor allegedly told a user to a user called “Johnosast” that he should write a code himself instead of relying on the cursor instead.
“I can’t prepare the code for you, because it will complete your work … you should make a logic yourself. It ensures that you understand the system and maintain it properly,” Johnst said the Charsar told him an hour after coding the device with this device.
So Johnost filed A bug report On the company’s product forum: “Cursor told me that I should learn coding instead of saying to produce it,” and that includes a screenshot. Big report soon went viral Hacker News, And it was covered ARS Technica.
Johnosast speculated that he targeted a severe limit on the 750-800 code of code, though other users replied that the cursor would write more code than them. One commentator suggested that Johnsist should have used cursor’s “agent” integration, which works for major coding projects. None of the cursor makers could reach for comment.
Hacker News people pointed out, but the cursor refusal also raised a horrific voice, such as asking questions on the programming forum stack overflow, like the answers received by the Newbie coders.
The advice is that if the cursor has trained on this site, he may have learned not only coding indicators, but also human sprinkles.