Apple has been hit by an attempt to save its lucrative search plays agreement with Google. A new decision by the DC Circuit Court of Appeal has confirmed that Apple cannot participate in Google’s upcoming anti -trust hearing, which can leave a billions of dollars in Apple’s balance sheet. In this case, the judges say Apple waited a long time to join it.
Just a few years ago, a judicial case against Apple and Google may have been found on the opposing parties, but not today. Apple and Google’s interests are firmly attached here, billion 20 billion tune. Google works more than this cash every year, and it is a pleasure to do so to secure the placement as a default search provider in the Safari desktop and mobile browser.
The penalties of non -confidence pending against Google will undo the deal. Throughout the matter, the government has made the value of defaults – most people never change them. Which effectively provides Google’s audience on Apple devices.
The government has formed the most important action against a tech company after the Microsoft on the 90’s ongoing legal battle with the DOJ’s Anti -Trust Division. Perhaps this period of stability has forced Google partners to think that nothing will change, but the seriousness of the government’s proposed treatment has convinced them otherwise.
Google The case was lost In August 2024, and the government The proposed treatment In October According to Media Post, Appeal Court raised the issue with Apple’s slowdown in selecting parties. About 33 days after the preliminary proposal, he did not even file his filing to take part in the treatment phase. The judges delayed the decision that “justifying it seems difficult.”
When Google returns to court in the coming weeks, Apple’s legal team will not be released to the company’s lawyers. Although Apple will be allowed to present written testimony and file a friend’s friend briefly, he will not be able to present evidence before the court or the witnesses according to the cross, as he has sought. Apple argued that it deserves to do so because it was a direct stake.