Many states consider pricing requirements
Although the California proposal will face opposition to ISPs and does not guarantee a law, the amended bill contains a speeding requirement of a $ 15 project compared to the current New York law that affected it. New York Legally By offering ISPs $ 15 broadband projects with a download speed of at least 25 Mbps, or complying with 200 MBPS speeds to comply with a 20-month service. The New York law does not specify the least uploaded speed.
AT & T Off the offer Instead of fully complying with its 5G Home Internet service in New York. But AT&T will not be able to remove Home Internet service from California so easily because it offers DSL and Fiber Internet in the state, and it’s still Has been classified as the last resort carrier For landline phone service.
The California Bill says ISPs should file annual reports starting January 1, 2027, to explain their cheap projects and explain the number of households who bought the service and the number of families rejected on the basis of capacity confirmation. It seems that the bill assumes that ISPs will present plans before 2027, but the date has not been explained. The Bowner’s office told us that the rule would be implemented on January 1, 2026. Bowner’s office is also working on exemption for small ISPs, but the final details have not been fixed.
Meanwhile, a Massachusetts Bill The proposed proposal requires that ISPs provide at least 100 MBPS speeds in Month 15 for a month or 200 Mbps for $ 20 a month. A Edemont bill 25 Mbps a month or 200 MBPS will need $ 20 a month.
Telco groups told the Supreme Court Last year, when the New York law “would potentially lead to high rate rule, he claimed that AT&T’s departure from New York proves that the law is negatively impacting. But the Supreme Court twice refused to hear the industry challenge, which allowed New York to enforce the law.