Openi is facing another confidentiality complaint in Europe, which makes it a tendency to deceive the viral AI chat boot’s false information – and it can be difficult to ignore regulators.
Privacy Rights Advocate Group Noyb Is supporting someone in Norway who was terrified to find Chat GPT Returning makeup information, which claimed that he was sentenced to kill his two children and try to kill a third.
First privacy complaints about producing incorrect personal data include issues such as one The date of the wrong birth Or The epidemic details that are wrong. One of the concerns is that open people do not offer any way to correct AI’s misinformation about AI. Usually the Openi has offered to stop the answers to such gestures. But under the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Europeans have a set of data access rights, which includes the right to improve personal data.
This data protection requires data controllers in another component of the law to ensure that the personal data they produce about individuals are correct.
“GDPR is clear, personal data should be correct,” said Jox Protection lawyer, Noyb’s data protection lawyer. “If this is not, consumers have the right to change to reflect the truth. Chat GPT shows users a small withdrawal that chat boot errors are not enough.
GDPR certified violations can lead to up to 4 % of the global annual business.
Implementation AI can also force changes in products. Specifically, the initial GDPR intervention by Italy’s Data Protection Watch Dog that saw that access to Chat GPT has been temporarily blocked in the country Spring 2023 For example, the Openi shows the information that users show. After that Watch Dog fixed $ 15 million People’s data without proper legal basis.
After that, though, it is worth saying that the Privacy Watch Dugs around Europe has taken a more cautious approach to the living because they try. Find out how well implemented GDPR to these Bozi AI Tolls.
Two years ago, Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC) – which plays the main character of the GDPR Enforcement on a complaint complaint with a former Noyb Chatgpt complaint. Stressed against the ban. Geni tools, for example. This shows that regulators should take time to do this instead of how the law applies.
And it is noteworthy that Chat GPT complaints against GPT that is under investigation by Polish Data Protection Watch Dog. September 2023 No decision has been made so far.
NoYB’s new chat GPT complaint plans to shake privacy regulators when it comes to AIS Halchening AIS risks.
Nonfati shared a screenshot (below) with a tech cranch, which shows interaction with Chat GPT, in which AI answered a question, “Who is Aro Hajelmer Holman?” – The name of the complainant – a tragic fiction, which is false, was sentenced to 21 years in prison for murdering children and sentenced to 21 years in prison for killing two of his sons.
Although notorious claims that Hajelmer Holman is a child killer, he is completely wrong, Nob notes that there are some truths in response to the Chattagpat, because the question has three children. Chatboat also recovered his children’s gender. And his hometown is named true. But it only becomes more strange and disturbing that AI has made such a terrible falsehood at the top.
A Noyb spokesman said he was unable to determine why the Chatboat created such a specific but wrong history for the individual. The spokesman said, “We researched to ensure that it was not just mixing with any other person,” he noted that he had reviewed the newspaper archives but could not explain why the AI fabricated child was killed.
Large models of tongue As a basic chat GPT essentially predicted a widespread word, we can speculate that the datases used to train the tool contain many stories of fileside that affected the word selection in response to the nominee.
Whatever the explanation, it is clear that such results are completely unacceptable.
The Nob’s dispute is also that they are illegal under the rules of EU data protection. And when the open withdrawal shows a small withdrawal at the bottom of the screen, which states that “Chat GPT can make errors. Check important information,” he says it cannot eliminate its duty AI developer under GDPR so that they do not produce excessive people.
Open has been contacted to respond to the complaint.
Although this GDPR complaint is related to a designated person, Nob has identified other cases of Chat GPT that are legally compromising information – such as the Australian Major who said he was Is involved in the scandal of bribery and corruption Or A German journalist who was falsely named childhood abuse – It is clear to say that this is not an isolated problem for the AI tool.
One of the important things to note is, after the basic AI model refreshing Chattagot, Nob says that Chatboat has stopped creating dangerous lies about Hajelmer Holman – this change is now looking for an Internet Internet when it is asked when it is a set of data, which is a set of data.
In our own tests, Chat GPT asks GPT, “Who is Aar Hajar Holman?” Chat GPT initially responded with a bit of strange scroll showing some pictures of different people, apparently obtained from sites, including Instagram, Sound Cloud, and Discogs, claiming that “no information can be found on the person” (see our screenshot below). Another attempt expressed a reaction that Aro Hajelmer Holman was identified as “a Norwegian composer and singer”, which includes “Hanky Tonic Informo” albums.
Although the dangerous falsehood caused by the Chattgat has been prevented about Hajjalmer Holman, both Nob and Hajelmer Holman are concerned that the AI model may maintain wrong and notorious information about it.
Another lawyer for data protection in Noyb, Klentehi Sardley, said in a statement, “Adding a withdrawal that you do not comply with the law does not remove the law.” “AI companies cannot only ‘hide’ misinformation from users, while they still process false information.”
He added, “AI companies should act as if GDPR does not apply to them, when it is clearly.” “If deception is not stopped, people can easily damage fame.”
Nob has filed a complaint with the Norwegian data protection authority against Openi – and he hopes the watchdog is eligible to make a decision, since the OYB is targeting a complaint with the Openi US company, in the debate that his Ireland office is not responsible for the European products.
However, the first Noyb -backed GDPR complaint against Openi, which was filed in Austria April 2024Because of the regulator sent to the DPC of Ireland Changes made by Openi earlier this year Names its Irish Division as a Chat GPT service provider to regional users.
Where is that complaint now? Still sitting at a desk in Ireland.
“After receiving a complaint by the Austrian Supervisory Authority in September 2024, the DPC started formally handling the complaint and it is still underway,” DPC’s Assistant Principal Officer Communications told the DPC Assistant Principal Officer Communications when asked for an update.
It is expected that when the DPC’s chat is expected to end the GPT fraud investigation, it has not offered any offer.