A group of former Open employees on Friday filed a The proposed amnex short In his case against Openi, in support of Elon Musk, opposition to the change in non -profit -profit corporation from Openi’s planned planning.
Short, 12 former Openi employees named by Harvard’s law professor and creative Alam founder Lawrence Lesg: Steven Adler, Roserie Campbell, Neil Chaudhry, Jacob Hilton, Daniel Cocotzlo, Greenchchin Craigger, Todor Marcov, Richard Sunder, Richard Sunder, Sander, Sander, Willem, Sander, Willem, Sander, Willem. This is the case, if the business works of the non -profit organization of Openi are overcome, it will “basically violate his mission.”
Many of the former staff have already spoken publicly against the openings. Saudi Has met the company To improve its accountability and transparency, while Cocoicjlo and Sanders had earlier warned that the Open AI is in The “careless” race for AI’s dominance. Wayne Wright Have said They should not be open [be trusted] When it promises to do the right later.
In a statement, an open -minded spokesman said the openness of the openness “is not going anywhere” and the organization’s mission “will remain the same.”
“Our board has been very clear,” the spokesman told Tech Crunch via email. “We’re turning our current lucrative arm into a Public Benefit Corporation (PBC)-the structure that is like other AI labs like Entropic-where some of these former employees now work-and [Musk’s AI startup] Replace. “
Open was founded in 2015 as a non -profit, but it turned into a “capacity profit” in 2019, and now he is once again trying to reorganize the PBC. When it moved to a capacity profit, the Open retained its non -profit wing, which currently has a shares of controlling in the corporate arm of the organization.
The Open has been accused of abandoning his unprecedented mission in a Musk case, which aims to ensure his AI research to benefit all humanity. Kasturi had summoned a preliminary order Halt Openai’s change. A federal judge Refused the requestBut this case allowed the spring to go to the jury trial in Spring 2026.
According to the former employees’ briefing, the current structure of the open-powers-a non-profit that controls one group of other subsidiaries-is a “important part” of its overall strategy and is “critical” for the organization’s mission. The reorganization, which removes the non -profit controlling role, will not only contradict the mission and charter promises of the open, but will also violate the confidence of employees, donors and other stakeholders who join and support the organization based on those promises. “
“Openai binding several important principles for execution [its] The mission in their charter document, “briefly writes. The court should admit that it is necessary to maintain non -profit rule in order to preserve the open AI’s unique structure, which was designed to ensure that artificial general intelligence should serve humanity instead of serving tight financial interests.
Artificial general intelligence, or AGI, is widely considered that AI means that can complete any task to a person.
According to the briefing, the open often used his structure as a recruitment tool – and repeatedly assured the staff that the non -profit control was “critical” in carrying out its mission. The briefer mentioned the open -ended meeting of the open on the end of 2020, during which Open CEO Sam Altman allegedly emphasized that non -profit governance and surveillance “guaranteed that security and widespread social benefits were preferred over short -term financial benefits.
The briefs read, “In recruiting conversations with candidates, it was common to present the unique rule structure of the Openi as an important difference between rivals such as Open AI and Google or Entropic, and one of the main reasons for this should be considered to be included in the company.” “That is why often used to persuade employees who were considering leaving rivals to stay in Open – including some of us.”
The short warning is that, an openness should be allowed to be converted to a profit, it can be encouraged “[cut] The corners are concentrated in “protective work and powerful AI” its shareholders. In the current charter of the open, a lucrative open reason for banning the “integration and support” clause will have little reason, which promises that the Open AI will stop competing with and support any “value, security,” project before.
Former your employees, some of whom were research and policy leaders in the company, joined the growing harmony, strongly opposed the transfer of the open.
Earlier this week, a group of organizations, including California’s Tamusters and Labor Groups, requested California Attorney General Robbanta to stop the Openi from becoming profitable. He claimed that the company “has failed to protect its charitable assets” and is safely “ending its charitable mission to advance safe artificial intelligence.”
Encoded, a non -profit organization that co -patronized by California Unjustifiable SB 1047 AI Safety Legislature, Referred to similar concerns at the Amex briefcase Filed in December
Openi has said that it has a change Will preserve its non -profit arm And influence the resources spent on “relief measures” in areas such as health care, education, and science. In exchange for its controlling stake in Openi’s enterprise, non -profit Allegedly standing up to take advantage of billions of dollars.
The company has “really getting ready to make the world the best profitable so far. We are not changing it.” Wrote in a series of posts on x Wednesday
Openi is high at stake, which needs to be completed by the end of this year or next profitable conversion or has taken the risk of abandoning some of the raised capital in recent months, According to Reports.