All the time and then, the Silicon Valley Startup launched with such a “ridiculous” mission that it is difficult to know if the startup is for real or just sarcasm.
Is the same thing MechanismA startup whose founder-and unprofessional AI Research Organization, which was founded by Epoch, is being scaled over the X after announcing it.
The mission of the startup in the complaints and it means that it eliminates the reputation of its honorable research institute. (Also a director at the Research Institute Posted On X, “Yes, what I wanted for my bed: a commission crisis.”)
Mechanins were launched through a Thursday post on x Through its founder, the famous AI researcher Tami Basirglo. Basierglo writes that the purpose of the startup is “complete automation of all works” and “complete automation of the economy”.
Does this mean that the mechaniz is working to convert every human worker to an AI agent boot? Basically, yes. Startup wants to provide data, diagnosis and digital environment to make automation possible to any job workers.
Even the total identity market of Mecca has been calculated by collecting all human wages. He wrote, “The market is very high here: workers in the United States pay $ 18 trillion in the year. For the whole world, this is three times higher, which is $ 60 trillion every year.”
However, Basierglo explained to the Tech Crunch that “our immediate focus is on white collar work” which will require robotics instead of manual labor jobs.
The startup response was often brutal. As a X -user Anthony Agni He replied, “great respect for the founders’ work in the era, but regretted it. Most human labor automatic is really a huge reward for companies, which is why many big companies are already looking for it. I think this will be a great loss for most humans.”
But the controversial part is not just the mission of the beginning. Basirglo’s AI Research Institute analyzes the economic impact of AII, AI and develops benchmarks for AI’s performance. This is believed to be a neutral way to test the claims of SATA Frontier model makers and others.
This is not the first time The covenant has been in conflict. In December, Ephench revealed that Openai supported the formation of one of his AI Benchmarks, which the Chat GPT maker then unveiled his new O3 model. Social media users found that the pledge should have been more exposed.
When Basirglog announced the mechanism, x user Oliver Herbika replied“Sorry, it looks like almost confirmation that Apech Research is eating directly in border capacity works, though I hope it will not literally come from you.”
Basiergloo says Macaoniz is one who supports not Fredman and Daniel Grass, Patrick Collison, Dorkesh Patel, Jeff Dean, Schulto Douglas, and Marcus Abramoich. Fredman, Grass, and Dan did not return the application for the Tech Crunch comment.
Marx Abramovich confirmed that he had invested. Abramoich is a Managing Partner in the Crypto Hedge Fund ALTX, and Suicide “Effective Alturist.”
He told Tech Crunch that he invested in it because, “The team is unusual in many dimensions and has thought deeply on AI than anyone.”
Even good for humans?
Nevertheless, Basierglo has argued to Nisiors that doing all the work with agents will further strengthen humans, they will not be made poor through “explosive economic growth”. He points toward a Paper it published On title
“Fully automatic labor can create wide abundance, high quality of living, and new equipment and services that we cannot even imagine today,” he told Tech Crunch.
This can be true for the agents who own. That is, if employers pay them instead of developing in their home (probably, by other agents?).
On the other hand, this hope theory ignores a fundamental fact: If humans do not have a job, they will not have income to buy all the goods manufactured by AI agents.
Nevertheless, Basiergloo says that human wages should increase reality in such an automated world because such workers are “more valuable in complementary roles that AI cannot perform.”
But remember, the purpose is to do all the work for agents. When asked about it, he explained, “Even in the scenarios where the wages may decrease, economic welfare is not fully determined by wages. People usually receive income from other sources-such as rent, profit and public welfare.”
So maybe we all live our lives with stock or real estate. Failure to do this, always welfare – if AI agents are paying taxes.
Although the baseroglo vision and mission are clearly extremely extremely extremely, the technical problem they are looking for to solve is legal. If every human worker has a personal staff of agents who help them create more work, economic abundance can be followed. And the baseroglovo is undoubtedly at least on one thing: one year in the age of AI agents, They don’t work very well.
He noted that he was incredible, not maintaining information, struggling to complete the tasks freely, “and cannot implement long -term plans without going out of the rails.”
However, he is hard to work on reforms. Giant companies like Sales Force and Microsoft Aging is creating platforms. There is also an opinion. And agent startups are too high: from work experts (outbound sales, financial analysis); To those working on training data. Are doing other work Agent’s pricing economics.
In the meantime, Basierglo wants you to know: Mechanics are hiring.