The bill of reconciliation is primarily focused on access to medical access and healthcare fees for millions of Americans. AI supply appears as an increase in healthcare changes in health care, which is likely to limit the debate on the implications of technology policy.
This move is already an impressive response. On Monday, tech safety groups and at least one Democrat criticized the proposal, Hill. Member of the Trade, Manufacturing and Trade Sub -Committee, Rap. John Shakovsky (DIEL) has termed the proposal “Big Tech a great gift”, while non-profit groups such as Tech Evarite Project and Consumer reports have warned that it will leave consumers unsafe by harming AI such as Deep Fax and BAIAs.
The Big Tech’s White House contacts
President Trump has already done Reversed Several Biden era executive orders on AI’s safety and risk tackling. Pressure represents an increase in the industry -friendly approach to the AI policy of the administration to prevent state -level AI regulation.
Perhaps it is not surprising, because even before the president took office, the AI industry has built close ties with the Trump administration. For example, Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk Serves Department of Government Performance (DOGE), while Business David Sawas works “You have Zar,” And allegedly venture capitalist Mark Anderson Advice Sam Altman, CEO of Administration Openi Appeared with Trump In the announcement of the AI Data Center Development Plan in January.
By restricting the authority of the states over AI regulation, this supply can prevent state governments from using federal funds to prepare AI surveillance programs or auxiliary measures that are withdrawn from the administration. The unethical position. The ban will go beyond the implementation of the ban so that it can potentially affect how the states design and fund their AI governance framework.