Legal fodder The US Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees were filed. Alliance for retired Americans; And the American Federation of teachers. “This case states that” there is never a group of unelected, unelected, and unacceptable people before – which has been controversially described as employees of White House employees, current or Puto Agencies (multiple and many), and have access to sensitive information – access to the government. “
The Hollander wrote, a temporary ban, the order remains unless the preliminary order is heard, though the legal standards for temporarily prevention or the preliminary order are basically the same. The temporary prevention order lasts for 14 days but can be extended.
“In my opinion, the plaintiffs have shown the possibility of success on the qualities that they do not have the need for access to the privacy act provided by the SSA’s record provided by the SSA. Therefore, access violates both the Privacy Act and the APA.”
In the meantime SSA has been targeted Deduction in the DOG fuel budget To impress its actions.
Order
Order They say that the SSA has to eliminate the Dodge access. Kasturi, Glasses, and all other Dodge team members and its affiliates “will eliminate and delete all non -anonymous PII [personally identifiable information] “In their possession or in their control, directly or indirectly, provided or obtained from any SSA system, which has directly or indirect access from January 20, 2025, or has access to them,” it is said.
The DOGE defendants are also forbidden to install any software on “SSA devices, information systems, or record systems, and they will remove any software installed before January 20, 2025, or have been installed by them,” and any SSA’s access to computer, or any SSA. “
The SSA is allowed to provide radical or anonymous records, and under certain conditions, according to the Privacy Act, can provide “access to discrete, special and non -anonymous data”. According to the order, “the SSA should first be subject to writing from a member of the Dage Team, and the possible court review, a detailed explanation about the requirement of the record and why, because for specific and discarded records, is not suitable suitable for an anonymous or red -recorded record specific use.” “The general and final explanation that requires information for fraud or waste search is not enough to set the need.”