“Meta is a proud story of success, and we look forward to continuing the innovation and service of people and businesses who love our services,” said a meta spokesperson.
Experts are not so sure that Meta has caught it
Boseberg has said that the key question that they should answer is whether the definition of the FTC market is very narrow.
Meta has said, discussing the definition of market Connecting friends and family is not even the “basic use” of meta appsSince a competitive competitive social media is forced to transform its news feeds into discovered engines due to landscape. Anti -Trust analyst Justin Teresi told Bloomberg that since the FTC failed to show that consumers mainly come to meta apps to connect with friends and family, it could strengthen the meta issue.
Rebecca Elinsworth, a professor of Wanderblat Law, told Bloomberg that “the limited market described by the FTC was always the weakest part of its case,” but the government has “done a good job of minimizing this weakness”, which is not appropriate for apps and apps.
Alan Worth advised that “this became clear when Meta looked at Spike on the holiday,” which is probably a sign that “people were turning to this product to connect with their loved ones.”
Tracy believes that Meta has received a 60 % shot at the trial, though she has criticized Meta’s seemingly defense that any online advertisement company competing for the dollar is competing with Meta. He suggested that this argument has greatly expanded the definition of the market.
“If you are saying that the relevant market here is competing for advertising dollars, you can throw anything there.” “You can throw TV there, you can throw print there if you want, and there is really no end to this concept.”
Alan Worth had less confidence in the possibility of meta, and saying to Bloomberg, “I really think Think that it can run in any way.”