However, the authors believe that it is so notorious to ture the pirate tasks that they now have a “open and shut case” of copyright violations.
The authors alleged that “without the permission of copyright books of Meta’s plaintiffs, including Monday to foot file sharing, is not properly used.”
However, Chibra may be curious to find out more about lectures. In a Meta letter, a margin states that last month, he confessed at a hearing that the term was foreign.
“I don’t remember to hear that before,” said Chibaria.
The authors are hoping that Meta allegedly paid a Meta salary after offering her data for a fee for fees.
The authors alleged that “Meta had clearly given copyright works that had taken it for free: a windfall for Meta, but not for the authors, who were not given anything,” the authors charged. Further, “whether another user has actually downloaded the Meta” through tournament “, is irrelevant,” the authors charged. “Meta re -presented the work” as soon as she made them available to other colleagues. “
Meta Zuckerberg is against the request to oust
The authors want to agree that Meta’s alleged leaking is key to winning her case. His filing also pointed out that the pirates of the meta contain copies of at least 10 Supreme Court judges written by books, apparently hoping that the judge will see that Meta’s activity is more harmful to the authors.
To further their case, the authors sought additional discovery, which needed to provide written responses to Meta’s tornado and lectures. He also tried to oust the two meta employees, who first testified, including Mark Zuckerberg, as well as those whose role in the meta -touring tournament was just. Recently has been clarified in non -cell emails.