For five weeks, the Federal Trade Commission asked a Federal Judge to imagine a world where Instagram and WhatsApp were flourished out of Meta control instead of getting through Tech Dev. In the sixth and last week of the trial, Meta told Judge James Bosberg that she should consider that in fact, these apps could be as good as they could.
Meta rested her case after a short day in court on Wednesday (many of her witnesses were also called by the FTC, so she had already had the opportunity to question her in the first weeks). In these last days, Meta WhatsApp Cofounder called Brian Acton And to explain how the Meta has helped to expand these apps in a way that they are unlikely, to explain the initial Instagram infrastructure executive. Instagram Coofounder’s testimony to Kevin SistromThose who claimed that Meta stopped resources to help the app grow and secure, and believe that Instagram would still be hitting itself.
Meta argues that it is more possible to become more useful or accessible to consumers than today, becoming a rival to the Meta’s strength, Instagram and WhatsApp.
Many meta witnesses also called the elephant in the room: Ticatok. FTC says social media apps mainly focused on entertainment like Teltok and YouTube. Personal social networking services are not part of the market It claims that meta has a monopoly – where users connect with their friends and family. Meta says the definition is deprived of how social media works. Instead of focusing on how consumers use aspects of apps, it is argued, the judge should pay attention to who the industry players compete with each other. It says that what really restricts its power is consumer time and attention, creators’ content and a permanent fight for the dollar.
“The law of distrust does not need to consider such a ‘unlimited range’ of potential alternatives.
Economists helped to argue Meta that the rapid growth of trickwak faces real competition, which must be calculated. Although the FTC has been developed as a very strong competitor for the tricktok meta products since the first time the FTC filed the case, Boseberg warned. November order Meta’s argument about competing for time and attention is “true but except this point.” He wrote, to accept Meta’s theory, it would need to be accepted that “Meta does not only compete with YouTube, Taxot, and X, but also compete with a friend’s house watching a movie, reading a book in the library, and playing an online poker.” “The law of no -confidence does not need to consider such a ‘unlimited limit’ of a potential alternative.”
However, he also warned that the government’s claims “sometimes pressurize the country’s offer of interpretation of their limits.” During the trial, Boseberg seriously testified Alex Schulettz, chief marketing officer of Meta Meta, testified: Facebook and Instagram have already included many US users as much as they can. The FTC noted that Meta’s user growth rate may be slowly visible because it has already included most of the country’s 250 million potential eligible users, but even despite its contesting from Techtok and YouTube, it does not mean that it is still not growing overall. Schulettz said that is why it has become so important to compete with these apps for focus, because if almost Everyone is downloaded to them, which one is opened regularly.
Boseberg later asked Scott Hamfal to respond to the FTC’s central economic expert, adding that it would be “very difficult” for Instagram to grow bigger in the United States than ever. Hamfal argued that growing its massive Instagram today does not mean that Meta has improved social media for consumers otherwise it will be much greater. He said that without the responsibility of the meta, he said, the entire personal social networking market – not only Instagram – Consumer welfare and app standards can be improved for consumers on matrix.
“Meta is a proud American success story”
Meta has argued that the FTC has been living in the past and exaggerates the continued importance of sharing with friends and family on its apps. Nevertheless, the company has acknowledged that some consumers still want to use their products to connect their products in real life, which indicates to start “OG Facebook”, which allows consumers to scroll through the feed of their bilateral contacts, and avoiding it in 2025, in 2025. Facebook chief Tom Alison testified that at the main feed, a user has to scroll all day to see all posts from his friends, as the “basic experience” has been removed from such content.
Judge Boseberg will decide whether the experience of connecting with friends on social media is still so important that the market becomes a separate part of the meta. He dismissed Attempt to achieve the early rule of Meta However, in his favor, saying that he is Not ready to issue a decision Still. If he supports the FTC, the government will possibly tell him that Meta considered tearing up apps purchased to enhance its empire.
Meta says it will lead to the same kind of innovation, which the FTC claims to be publicized. “After trying to make his case to end the acquisition of a decade ago, six weeks ago, and shows that no contract is really final, the FTC has shown only one thing that was the past, present and future dynamic, the most vibrant, the most vibrant.” “Meta is a proud American success story, and we look forward to the innovation and service of people and businesses who love our services.”