Great Google Spin
Although Google certainly does not want to lose Chrome, the treatment of DOJ can be a more fundamental threat to its business. The DOJ argued that Google’s illegal monopoly has given it the lead of incredible technology, but a collection of data treatment can focus on it. Under the DOJ’s proposal, Google will have to grant some of its basic search technology licenses, including the search index and ranking algorithm.
Google CEO Sunder Pachai testified in the trial and declared the treatment of these data not better than one. Google Search’s spin off. Google’s previous statements have cited it as a “white labeling” Google search. Pachi claimed that these treatments could force Google to review the money spent on research in search of it and in search of it and in search of all theoretical licenses.
Currently, there is no official API to synd with Google search results. There are scrars whose purpose is to offer this service, but it is a brown area, at least to say. Google has also rejected profitable deals to share its index. Tourley noted in his testimony that Openi contacted Google to license the index for Chat GPT, but Google decided that the deal could damage its search dominance, which was more important than a short -term salary.
AI develops
Initially, DOJ wanted to force Google to stop investment in AI firms, fearing that its influence could be reduced because it gained control or gained the startup. The government has withdrawn from this remediation, but AI is still the main focus of the search case. It seems that Judge Mehta was surprised.
During the testimony of the pitch, Mehta remarked that the status of AI has changed substantially after the phase of the trial in 2023. “The permanent testimony from the witnesses was that the AI and the search for the search or search for AI was years away,” said Mehta. Mehta noted that matters are very different now, with several Google rivals in AI search. It can actually help Google.