Jewelio Copy, who is now a senior human -friendly officer of non -profit access, who has researched the use of blockchain in humanitarian work, says blockchain technologies, while sometimes effective, can offer no clear benefits than other tools organizations, such as the current payment system or any other payment system. He says, “There is no benefit whether it is cheap or better.” “The way it has been presented is the tech soluble view that has been proven repeatedly to not have any significant effect.”
However, there are some successful examples of the use of blockchain technology in the humanitarian sector. In 2022, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) A small pilot driven Give cash assistance to Ukrainians displaced in a stable coin through the Russian-UK war. Are other pilots Tested in Kenya Through Kenya Red Cross Society. The Red Cross International Committee, which works with the Kenya team, also helped development Humanity Suz token Solution (HTS).
An NGO representative who uses blockchain technology, but did not have the option to talk to the media regarding USAID issues, says that in particular, in relation to the transfer of money, Stabonins can be faster and easier than in other ways to reach the affected communities. However, “introducing a new system means you are setting a new burden” for many organizations that are USAID partners. “The cost of new systems is difficult for small NGOs,” which often contain local organizations that will be on the first line of disaster response.
Blockchain seems to emphasize more strict control over technology than to adopt aid. Memo, for example, seems to suggest that funding should be permanently on the results, reading, “Paying results and results will ensure the taxpayer’s dollar will have the maximum impact.” An USAID employee, who asked to be anonymous because he did not have the authority to talk to the media, says many USAID contracts already work in which organizations are paid after performing their work. However, this is not possible in all situations. He says, “This type of deal is often not flexible in the environment in which we work,” he says, adding that in conflict or destruction areas, conditions may change rapidly, which means that may be able to be or need to be organized.
Rafri says the language looks misleading, and the claims of the Bolters by the Musk and the administration who were USAID corrupt. She says, “It is not that USAID was providing tons of cash to those who did not work.”
This story originally appeared Wired dot.