US tries to keep DOGE and Musk work secret in appeal of court-ordered discovery

The petition argues that discovery is unnecessary to assess the claims of the plaintiffs. “The plaintiff accuses the view of appointments and violating the US legal authority that the USD and Mr Musk are directing the decision by the office holders,” he said. “These claims offer pure questions of the law that can be resolved and rejected on the basis of plaintiffs’ complaint. Appointment Of office holders; It does not belong In fact Impact on those holding office. “

States: Discover can confirm the role of musk in Dodge

The states of the states It has been alleged that “President Trump has handed over Mr Musk to practically non -checking powers without proper legal permission from Congress and without meaningful surveillance of his activities. As a result, he has changed a minor position that was previously a nominee for any government websites without a nominee.

States Debate This discovery “may confirm that the investigating reporting has already indicated: the defendant Elon Musk and the department’s performance (‘Dodge’) are directing measures within the federal agencies that have caused deep damage to the states.”

Amy Gleyson, that person White House Claims are running down Instead of a muskIs, is According to the notifications The department has been working simultaneously in health and human services since last month.

The filing of the states states that “the defendants claim that Mr Musk is merely a president’s adviser, who has no direct authority for the agency’s action and has no role in the dodge.” “Public records deny this understandable claim. But only the defendants have documents and information that the defendants need to confirm public reporting and need to identify which agencies will target the next defendants so that the defendant can get more loss and further relief.”

The states said, “In particular, the plaintiffs do not find any email, text messages, or other electronic communications at this stage, that is, the defendants will not need to be configured through such an exchange of such for compatibility or potential privilege.” “The documents that the plaintiffs make – planning, implementation, and organizational documents – are readily available to the defendants and do not affect the same privilege concerns.”

Discover the behavior of the Dodge and the musk

Chotkin writes that the plaintiffs’ documents and investigators usually relate to the Dodge and Musk’s behavior in four fields: (1) Eliminating or reducing the size of federal agencies;